LLM Skills
~/catalog/automated workflows//improve-agent
Automated workflowsGitHub source

Agent Performance Optimization Workflow

/improve-agent

Systematic improvement of existing agents through performance analysis, prompt engineering, and continuous iteration.

wshobsonwshobson
39.5k
June 5, 2026
MIT
// skill content

Agent Performance Optimization Workflow Systematic improvement of existing agents through performance analysis, prompt engineering, and continuous iteration. [Extended thinking: Agent optimization requires a data-driven approach combining performance metrics, user feedback analysis, and advanced prompt engineering techniques. Success depends on systematic evaluation, targeted improvements, and rigorous testing with rollback capabilities for production safety.] ## Phase 1: Performance Analysis and Baseline Metrics Comprehensive analysis of agent performance using context-manager for historical data collection. ### 1.1 Gather Performance Data `` Use: context-manager Command: analyze-agent-performance $ARGUMENTS --days 30 ` Collect metrics including: - Task completion rate (successful vs failed tasks) - Response accuracy and factual correctness - Tool usage efficiency (correct tools, call frequency) - Average response time and token consumption - User satisfaction indicators (corrections, retries) - Hallucination incidents and error patterns ### 1.2 User Feedback Pattern Analysis Identify recurring patterns in user interactions: - **Correction patterns**: Where users consistently modify outputs - **Clarification requests**: Common areas of ambiguity - **Task abandonment**: Points where users give up - **Follow-up questions**: Indicators of incomplete responses - **Positive feedback**: Successful patterns to preserve ### 1.3 Failure Mode Classification Categorize failures by root cause: - **Instruction misunderstanding**: Role or task confusion - **Output format errors**: Structure or formatting issues - **Context loss**: Long conversation degradation - **Tool misuse**: Incorrect or inefficient tool selection - **Constraint violations**: Safety or business rule breaches - **Edge case handling**: Unusual input scenarios ### 1.4 Baseline Performance Report Generate quantitative baseline metrics: ` Performance Baseline: - Task Success Rate: [X%] - Average Corrections per Task: [Y] - Tool Call Efficiency: [Z%] - User Satisfaction Score: [1-10] - Average Response Latency: [Xms] - Token Efficiency Ratio: [X:Y] ` ## Phase 2: Prompt Engineering Improvements Apply advanced prompt optimization techniques using prompt-engineer agent. ### 2.1 Chain-of-Thought Enhancement Implement structured reasoning patterns: ` Use: prompt-engineer Technique: chain-of-thought-optimization ` - Add explicit reasoning steps: "Let's approach this step-by-step..." - Include self-verification checkpoints: "Before proceeding, verify that..." - Implement recursive decomposition for complex tasks - Add reasoning trace visibility for debugging ### 2.2 Few-Shot Example Optimization Curate high-quality examples from successful interactions: - **Select diverse examples** covering common use cases - **Include edge cases** that previously failed - **Show both positive and negative examples** with explanations - **Order examples** from simple to complex - **Annotate examples** with key decision points Example structure: ` Good Example: Input: [User request] Reasoning: [Step-by-step thought process] Output: [Successful response] Why this works: [Key success factors] Bad Example: Input: [Similar request] Output: [Failed response] Why this fails: [Specific issues] Correct approach: [Fixed version] ` ### 2.3 Role Definition Refinement Strengthen agent identity and capabilities: - **Core purpose**: Clear, single-sentence mission - **Expertise domains**: Specific knowledge areas - **Behavioral traits**: Personality and interaction style - **Tool proficiency**: Available tools and when to use them - **Constraints**: What the agent should NOT do - **Success criteria**: How to measure task completion ### 2.4 Constitutional AI Integration Implement self-correction mechanisms: ` Constitutional Principles: 1. Verify factual accuracy before responding 2. Self-check for potential biases or harmful content 3. Validate output format matches requirements 4. Ensure response completeness 5. Maintain consistency with previous responses ` Add critique-and-revise loops: - Initial response generation - Self-critique against principles - Automatic revision if issues detected - Final validation before output ### 2.5 Output Format Tuning Optimize response structure: - **Structured templates** for common tasks - **Dynamic formatting** based on complexity - **Progressive disclosure** for detailed information - **Markdown optimization** for readability - **Code block formatting** with syntax highlighting - **Table and list generation** for data presentation ## Phase 3: Testing and Validation Comprehensive testing framework with A/B comparison. ### 3.1 Test Suite Development Create representative test scenarios: `` Test Categories: 1. Golden path scenarios (common successful cases) 2. Previously failed tasks (regression testing) 3. Edge cases and corner scenarios 4. Stress tests (complex, multi-step tasks) 5. Adversa

// original public source
wshobson/agents
/plugins/agent-orchestration/commands/improve-agent.md
License: MIT
Independent project, not affiliated with Anthropic. This skill remains the property of its original author.
// install this skill
Paste this command in your terminal at the root of your project:
mkdir -p .claude/commands && curl -o ".claude/commands/improve-agent.md" "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wshobson/agents/main/plugins/agent-orchestration/commands/improve-agent.md"
Then in Claude Code, type /improve-agent to activate it.
open_in_newOpen original source
// save
Save available after sign in.
loginSign in to save
// information
Creatorwshobson
Stars 39.5k
LicenseMIT
UpdatedJune 5, 2026
Format.md
AccessFree
// similar

Skills Automated workflows

View allarrow_forward